Jane English and Chenyang Li mainly differ on what they
think to be the definition of a favor. On one hand Jane English presents the
idea that a favor is simply an act done due to a request made by someone else.
However, Chenyang Li writes that not all favors have to be actions that are explicitly
requested for. They both agree though it would be a moral obligation to be appreciative
when a favor is done for you.
So the problem becomes, what is the definition of a favor? I
agree with Li in the sense that not all favors have to be specifically
requested for. When giving examples Li mentioned more urgent and larger scale
types of deeds in which much appreciation should be shown. Li challenges us to
imagine the appreciation that a mother must show to the person who saves her
three year old from drowning in a pond. Even though there was no request for
help, the mother who does not show appreciation for that “favor” would simply be
lacking moral character (Li 344). This contrasts to the examples that English
mentioned where Max was told to take in the mail while the neighbor was out of town. Anything additional thing that Max would do would not be considered a favor though. The scale of the action done by Max as compared to the scale of continually looking after a child is completely different. I would think that everyone would agree that the care for a child
requires total urgency. There is not one day in which the child can go on his or
her own without the help of the parents. When a child gains strength on his or
her own and has full capability then he or she ought to show appreciation for
the efforts of the parents. The duty that is towards parents is to take care of
them and to show good character to them. This means that the appreciation shown
is not necessarily obliging by every command because you are in some sort of
debt but because of love for the favor the mother has done in order for you
to get to your current standing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.