“Rather,
what children ought to do for their parents (and parents for children) depends
upon (1) their respective needs, abilities, and resources and (2) the extent to
which there is an ongoing friendship between them” (English). So that’s the
argument.
Honestly I’m pretty bored by this subject. The answer is either so obvious that it’s a
non-answer. That’s how I feel about English by the way. Or it’s just some
premise that’s not an argument it’s just some ontological lesson on the
importance of filial piety. I’m not interested in the debate as it stands, but
I think that’s because I don’t like the atomic family. I don't like the family as it stands. I like English’s
reasoning, which boils down to a simple thought. There’s nothing special about
parents or kids that warrants obligation. We probably only think that way
because we understand obligations or at least friendliness among friends
(there’s that obviousness) and family are very likely to become friends. I’d be
more interested in a thought experiment to see where I can move this around.
In a polyamorous family
obligations could get very complicated. Say there’s a generation of parents,
all equally responsible for raising the children. Now the children, if they are
friends with their parents ought to do something, if they have the resources.
But wait, if the group of parents is
large enough, taking care of them could be as complex and full of opportunity
costs as a small society (let’s go big, at least 100 parents living commune
style). Any one person surely couldn’t help the whole family and quite possibly
isn’t friendly with everyone! Should we only give medical care to the people we
like? What scares me most is that this pans out on a societal level. The state
is a paternal idea. It is supposed to help keep infrastructure intact, the world
clean (safe to live in at least) and provide medicine and education. Yet I’m
not on friendly terms with politicians and I don’t think most anyone is (I’m
sure thousands or millions are, but that’s a drop in the bucket of hundreds of
millions). And I’m all grown up, so I’m not obliged to anything? What I think
I’m getting down to is that treating your parents with the same standards as
anyone else is probably a good idea. It’s the way we treat everyone else that
needs another look.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.