Often, in matters
of human exploitation, we believe that abuse is less of a moral issue if the
victim is someone like a pedophile, rapist, or murderer who has repeatedly broken
the law. For this reason, I will regard these criminals specifically in this
essay. While more severe forms of punishment, such as forms of the death
penalty, used against like culpable individuals would be more morally
permissible due to the nature of their crimes than it would be if they were
petty criminals, the more intense and abusive the punishment, the less morally
permissible it is for anyone.
Illegal human
exploitation, (sometimes) torture, and poor treatment during medical
experimentation, while capable of yielding extremely relevant and important
results, is not moral in any account. Humans should not be reduced to the rank
of animals and used as little more than lab rats, as was done in this specific case. As compared to severe forms of punishment, treatment of humans in this
way is immoral because one treats them against their will as a means to an end.
Additionally, abuse of the victim is inappropriate since, in most cases, s/he
has not done anything to merit exploitation; the article describes that
prisoners of war, some women, children, and even innocent villagers were used
in the experiments. In some cases concerning morality, consent makes a
difference in the determination of an action’s ethical value; here, it holds no
weight. This is because one of the pillars of the victim’s humanity is being denied
recognition by the medical experimenters: rationality, which leads to the
formation of one’s dreams, desires, goals, and intentions. Ignoring that
another human has these aspirations is gravely disrespectful to his/her personhood
and dignity.
However, in strict
forms of punishment, a human maintains his/her “end” status as a subject, not an
object. The judge is not using the criminal, who is not a victim in this case,
for personal gain in this instance. Also, despite the fact that the justice system
is not perfect, criminals who do receive severe forms of punishment for their
actions ideally deserve their sentences and have had chances in the past to
ameliorate themselves. Thus, unlike before, these criminals had a chance in
determining their futures. Finally, the criminal, knowing the price for a
repeated offense, chooses to forgo his/her dreams, desires, goals, and
intentions. Thus, s/he commits a crime unto him/herself.
In conclusion, it
is not the subject who matters, since even the culpable are wronged by exploitative
medical experimentation. What does matter, however, is the treatment of the
person and the respect towards his/her defining qualities in the destructive act.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.