There seems to be a general consensus among the different articles
that the idea of comfort women is only bad when it is thought that the women had no choice in the
matter and were not paid for their work, and what is unclear is whether this was the case in every single comfort women related situation. The reason that I find these articles difficult to agree with in
its entirety is because of the blurred line between whether I find it morally permissible
to sell one’s own body for sexual pleasure or not. I believe that like similar cases previously
discussed in class this case has a threshold. The threshold in my viewpoint is at the
point of which that individual chooses not to perform sexual pleasure but is
forced to against his/her consent to do so. At this point, I believe that the
event is deemed morally impermissible and should be legally impermissible. The
example that helps me to come to this conclusion is one of a stripper and a
back room. A stripper is sometimes willing and other times forced for
economically related reasons to perform in a sexual way to obtain money. There
is also ways outside of simply stripping in which one is able to obtain a pay
increase. If the manager of the strip club asks him/her to take a client to a
back room and sexually pleasure them or else they will lose their job, then the
entire situation would be morally wrong. However, if the stripper decided to
sexually pleasure the client without coercion and with 100% consent, then the
situation would be morally permissible. I find this viewpoint rooting from the
ideals of human rights and autonomy. If one was to argue against me and say
what if, in the case for comfort women the women that were recruited were
recruited without coercion and with the women’s complete consent to the job of
being a prostitute for the men in the army. Also, what if like many cases the women were
not allowed to pick and choose their own partners, is it still morally permissible?
I would argue back that the idea of prostitution would be like the strip club
analogy, where each client is its own job. The inability to pick one’s own
client is what goes against morality because it takes away the person human
right to choose for themselves and if the person had the choice to turn down a
client without repercussions, then that would make being a comfort woman
morally permissible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.