I
am usually a fan of Buddhist ideologies, but I am inclined to disagree with the
argument that “the intentional hastening of death is…morally unacceptable in
all circumstances.” Keown notes that according
to Buddhist principles, all humans have the right to life. To Buddhists, life is sacred. I don’t disagree with either statement. Life is to be treasured, respected and not
trivialized. I do not agree with
Buddhist ideology about the lack of agency a person has in the use of their own
body. Kewon notes that Buddhists operate
under the assumption that every individual is “entitled to full moral respect”
while they are alive. I must have a
vastly different definition of “moral respect.”
I agree it is morally disrespectful to end a live without an individual’s
permission. If someone’s suffering is so
great that they wish to end their life, I would say it is their human right to
do so. I do not find it morally
impermissible to make informed, personal choices to remove pain, and quicken
the process of death. The Buddhist
ideology lacks support for the argument that it is morally impermissible to quicken
or assist death. The individual deserves life, and the right to choose to shorten their life based on the physical pain they feel.
An
individual’s spiritual destiny should not be dictated by how much pain they can
withstand before death. Removing that
choice removes the individual’s control over their body. I find it morally disrespectful to watch physical
suffering and refuse the individual the right to choose what to do with their
body based on the physical pain they endure. Kewon explicitly states that making “death the
aim” is partly why euthanasia is morally impermissible according to Buddhist
principles. If this is the case,
Buddhists misinterpret the intent of euthanasia. It is a human right to ask for medication to
end excruciating pain. Euthanasia is not
“killing rather than caring.” It would
be unfair to compare euthanasia to a suicide or killing because the factor of
pain is very important. If one is
suffering so much physically that they think it would be better for them to
die, it is not morally impermissible to allow them to make a decision about
their body. It is not disrespectful, and
does not trivialize the importance of the body.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.