When discussing the Islamic view on end-of-life issues, I
believe that there is a key difference of scenarios when euthanasia would be
accepted. The author mentions that the active killing of a terminally ill
patient would be immoral while the withdrawing of life-support in which the
disease is causing untreatable suffering would be deemed okay (779).
The difference in these scenarios is that there is a lack of
will-power in one while the other lacks bodily strength. In the case of
will-power, a primary theme within Islam is the idea of patience. Patience
simply does not mean taking a passive stand on things and allowing evil to be
done. Rather patience can be better defined as persevering through trials and
tribulations when trying to fix the problem. When patients are afflicted with
some sort of disease, if the bodily strength of the patient allows the person
to live, then the patient should go in search of medical treatment that will
either cure the disease or suppress the symptoms (i.e. pain). In the case of
cancer, a patient is told that the cancer has spread so far that it will likely
be fatal. This patient should go and seek out medicine that will benefit him by
attempting to cure or relieve pain. This again goes with the divine promise
that God has not created a disease without also creating a cure. However, after
all possible avenues have been utilized in treating the patient, it would be okay
for the patient to withhold any other medical care. This includes turning off
the respirator which is a procedure that does not necessarily treat the
patient. In this case if the patient was to die, even though it is considered
passive euthanasia, it occurred due to lack in bodily strength which neither
the patient nor the doctor could control.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.