One of the moral issues that seemed to be raised in the
readings on Hiroshima was that of whether or not to “fight fire with fire”.
Although a war was in fact going on, to many it seemed the way the United
States went about trying to fight it was out of hand. In efforts to get Japan
to surrender to the United States, two atomic bombs were dropped, one at
Hiroshima and one at Nagasaki. This instance is what many considered, and still
consider, to be fighting fire with fire, and in the case of many Japanese as well
as international peacemakers was believed to be the unethical way of going about
solving the conflict. Ghandi, for example, explained that although the dropping
of the atomic bomb may halt violence, it would be due to the disgust the rest
of the world felt about the destructive power of the bomb, and the yield of
violence would only be temporarily halted (Atom
Bomb and Ahimsa). In Ghandi’s eyes, fighting fire with fire in the case of
the atomic bomb would produce no true solution for the problem at hand, but
rather a momentary quick fix. F. W. de Klerk, the former president of South
Africa, also agrees that fighting fire with fire was not the right way to go
about trying to solve the conflict, and he believes that fighting this way will
hardly result in feelings of safety or security. De Klerk brings up the fact
that South Africa has voluntarily dismantled a nuclear capability and through “putting
that fire out” has found that the “ability to solve complex problems peacefully”
rather than with violence has created true security.
Even more moving than the words
from internationally influential people, were the words of A-bomb survivors.
These were individuals who, for the most part, were innocent civilians who just
happened to live in Hiroshima or Nagasaki at the time and had to face the immense
destruction caused by the atomic bomb, as well as the harsh effects that
accompanied it. In a few of the recollections of survivors, it was explained
how they had to witness family and friends die horrible painful deaths, but
were not lucky enough to die themselves. By fighting fire with fire, not only
physical destruction was caused, but mental destruction as well. Individuals
who survived the bombings were forced to live with the awful images that have
permanently scarred them. Many of these individuals wish that the bombs had
never been dropped and believe that by confronting the problem , instead of fighting
with violence, the conflict could have been solved much more peacefully and
ultimately with less negativity and destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.