Reading “Ethics and Religion, Moral Relativism,” the author
does something very peculiar. He says that even though every culture is
different, there is still an “underlying basis for all these specific codes”
(14). He provides an analogy with sports and cultures; he says that like sports
they can all be diverse but still have the same values and goals. With a closer
analysis of cultures you can easily identify things that they have the same basic belief
but just go about it in different ways. I completely agree with the author’s
point here, but this argument makes me question why this same inference can’t
be applied within religion and morality.
The
author, previously, gives many reasons why morality doesn't depend on religion.
I found a flaw in one of his arguments claiming that every religion is
so unique and different so each religion has their own set of moral precepts
(10). This is quite hypocritical of the author because he then states that
cultures have a common morality principle. Religion and culture are interconnected;
religion gives codes of conduct to a culture. With that being said, I think the
point he makes toward different cultures could be said with religion as well.
For instance, Muslims have to cover themselves for their religion and Catholics
do not. Even though they are not performing the same actions, the same
underlying principle is apparent. In both religions, you are not allowed to
have sexual intercourse before marriage; Muslims covering up is just a strong
and modest behavior to avoid this sin.
Overall,
one can see that the sport analogy that the author used for comparing culture
could be also used for comparing religion. Furthermore, various cultures and
religions might have different practices but there are definite basic moral
principles present that they all have in common.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.