If pleasure is the only intrinsic good, then we should do
whatever we can to maximize it for the most amount of time. If such a machine
existed where we could simulate a maximally pleasing life and the user didn’t
know he or she was using it, the fullest life would only be realized through
this machine. Controversy exists in the removal of any trueness or meaning to the exterior
world around the user with the exception of first-person experience. The people
I would interact with in the machine do not have actual “people” or “minds” behind
them. They are merely projections from complex software being imaged directly
into my consciousness. The hedonist
would probably say there is nothing wrong with the machine. Ignorance is bliss
and what you don’t know won’t hurt you. However, the existence of controversy in
the first place says something about what actually has intrinsic value. I do not question the intrinsic value of
pleasure, but what of the intrinsic value of meaning and truth? Having an experience
machine removes any meaning to the actions we do besides that of getting
pleasure; even if the user is unaware of being in such a machine. If someone
truly wants to help those in need, the experience machine can easily replicate
them having such a life. Though, their actions mean nothing in terms of actually
helping the needy. If one were to discover he or she was in the machine (at
least for helping the poor), would they not want to get out? They may get
pleasure in their ignorance, but their desire is for something beyond personal
feeling. Thus, if pleasure is the only intrinsic good, what we sometimes desire does
not line up with getting pleasure as the end all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.