I believe that there should be another category or theory of
intrinsic value and goodness. The proposed theories all have a lot of power,
but when combined they can mean a lot more. A simple concept that I think
captures all of these theories is justice. Justice has intrinsic value because
it provides a mix of the goodness theories that have been laid out. In simple
terms it can be defined as giving everything it’s due right.
In terms of ecosystems and well-being (two things which are
thought to have intrinsic value), you have to give due right to both. Our
well-being is important and “good” and so is the ecosystem that we are surrounded
by. In order to give due rights to both, we
cannot havoc the ecosystem without any cause. We also cannot let our
desires take over an intrinsic good that exists, but rather we can use it in a
way that increases our well-being without doing much harm. In the case of
animals which are part of ecosystems, I think it would be wrong to say that we
cannot kill any animal for our own well-being. Also, it would be wrong to say
that animals don’t have any right over us which we should abide by. The best
way to give due rights to both, our well-being and animals, would be to slaughter
animals in a way that does not afflict them with much pain. As humans who have
a higher understanding, we acknowledge that animals can feel pain and should use
that knowledge to kill them in way that minimizes pain when needed for our own
well-being.
We also have to be just with ourselves and our bodies. Our
mental state of well-being cannot simply be the definition of good if we
violate rights that we have to our own bodies. This means that we should not do
things that could cause us harm to a different part of ourselves, our body.
Justice is something that also prevails when dealing with
equality. When talking about justice and equality when someone is being treated
equally with everything they are not necessarily being dealt with in a just way.
A hypothetical situation can be created if there is a fence in which 3 people
need to look over it to watch a sporting event. The three people would
something to stand on in order to see. It would be considered equality if every
one of them was given the same thing. However, a shorter person may still be
too short to look over the fence. In that sense justice would be the ultimate
good that would allow all of them to look over the fence. If the shorter person
was given something taller to stand on justice would prevail. This means that
the greater good was done by being just.1
1http://kathyescobar.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/equality-vs-justice.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.